Search for: "Matter of Tapia"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2011, 7:12 pm
Monday morning, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Tapia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:20 am
Indeed, not only are courts without such authority, but “the BOP has plenary control” over those matters. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:42 pm
In Tapia v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:10 pm
The case is Tapia v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:36 am
The case is Tapia v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
In Tapia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:39 pm
Tapia, No. 09-50248 (12-8-11) (Reinhardt with Schroeder and Hudson, D.J.).The Supremes reversed and remanded the 9th in Tapia, 131 S. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
The US Supreme Court yesterday held in Tapia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:33 am
It appears Tapia’s car was hit by a “flying wheel from a tractor-trailer. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:32 am
Wendy Tapia will “return back to EMS ranks,” said a fire spokesman. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:53 am
This issue could be helpful for defendants in a wide variety of criminal matters, but as a child pornography possession lawyer, I believe it could be particularly useful to defendants facing child porn charges. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:06 am
By: Mayel Andres Tapia-Fregoso 2023 marks the end of the 108-year legacy of the Pac-12 athletic conference as we know it. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:36 am
They will return on April 18 for the case of Tapia v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
" As the point of the Hand affidavits in various no-fault matters has been to castigate the allegedly unfounded bases of certain SIU fraud investigations and affidavits submitted by no-fault insurers in support of their various motions, is Tapias evidence of one Hand really not knowing what the other is doing? [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:31 am
In the present case, Armando Tapia was specifically named in the affidavit. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:59 am
Tapia, 2011 WL 1260082 (U.S. [read post]
25 May 2008, 3:07 am
The decision does not say whether Travelers also denied WMC's billing based on late proof of claim (billing submitted more than 45 days after dates of service) and, if not, why not.Travelers apparently had issued an earlier denial directly to Tapia on May 16, 2007 based on late notice of the acccident (the decision indicating that telephone notice was first provided on April 4, 2007), but that NF-10 incorrectly listed Tapia's name as "Segundo R. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:50 pm
Tapia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:45 am
Claudia Tapia (Ericsson) asked whether antitrust bodies are interested at the point of the development of standards or at the approval of IPR Policy? [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:45 am
The last decision, Tapia v. [read post]
