Search for: "Matter of Waters"
Results 1 - 20
of 14,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2015, 8:43 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – WATER RIGHTS ADJUDICATION DA 15-0370, 2015 MT 353, IN RE THE CROW WATER COMPACT, IN THE MATTER OF THE ADJUDICATION OF EXISTING AND RESERVED RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER, BOTH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND, OF THE CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS OF THE STATE OF MONTANA [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 9:16 am
Now… for those of you who are bottled water drinkers… you now have the opportunity to slip through the eye of a needle when you buy Holy Water from an enterprising mob of water bottlers. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”Looks like the defendants’ arguments held water.# # #Matter of A&F Scaccia Realty Corp. v New York City Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 7:14 am
Here is the petition in Coachella Valley Water District v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 12:58 pm
Michael Pritchard demonstrated his Lifesaver Bottle that can turn filthy water into drinkable water in a matter of second. [read post]
31 May 2010, 4:19 am
[iii] Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Bill 72 – An Act to enact the Water Opportunities Act, 2010 and to amend other Acts in respect of water conservation and other matters [iv] Environmental Registry. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
The second is national sovereignty, and this has two aspects: the first includes the national accreditation of state‑based water use regimes under the 2007 Water Act and the legislative instrument of the Murray Darling Basin Plan, which impacts on domestic freshwater use matters; the second aspect of national sovereignty concerns the regulation of foreign ownership of freshwater which is a national competency under the Foreign Investment and Takeover Act 1975. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:24 pm
Recently at the 2009 TED, an engineer demonstrated a non chemical nano-filtration bottle that could change filthy water into drinking water in a matter of second. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
The hefty order, which spanned over a hundred and twenty pages, attempted to distill the thousands of pages of briefing the parties submitted on the matter. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 6:50 am
If a contract is clear and unambiguous, the court construes the provision as a matter of law. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
” Here’s the thing… it doesn’t matter in which area of law you are interested and in what part of the country you live… We all have major water issues. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:02 pm
While clarification may be needed, the proposed rule would effectively broaden, as a matter of law, federal jurisdiction over many types of streams and wetlands that are currently subject to a case-by-case assessment. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:27 am
Here are the materials in In the Matter of the Adjudication of the Existing and Reserved Water Rights to the Use of Water, Both Surface and Underground, of the Crow Tribe of Indians of the State of Montana: Allottees Opening Brief Federal-State-Tribal Brief Allottees Reply Brief [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:32 am
Although he overlooks a few matters -- like the motive underlying the rejection of riparian rights as an anti-federal government doctrine and the failure of the founders of the Colorado doctrine to grant limited terms instead of perpetual rights in water -- and his assumption that public property will inevitably be distributed to the wealthy and the well-organized might be questioned -- this book is law and history at its finest and should be read by all serious natural resources… [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 6:10 pm
“What is this database and why does it matter? [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
“Waters of the United States” The Sackett case turned on whether the construction of the Sackett residence adversely impacted “waters of the United States,” which seems like a fairly straightforward term at first glance, but whether certain water bodies constitute “waters of the United States” depends on whether the water body is “navigable,” a phrase that has its own specific definition… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
“Waters of the United States” The Sackett case turned on whether the construction of the Sackett residence adversely impacted “waters of the United States,” which seems like a fairly straightforward term at first glance, but whether certain water bodies constitute “waters of the United States” depends on whether the water body is “navigable,” a phrase that has its own specific definition… [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:15 am
The following SPR attorneys represented the Water District in this matter: David Yudelson, Daniel Riesel, Dan Chorost, and Ashley Miller. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:10 am
Waters. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 9:05 am
Unfortunatelly the law is silent of this matter. [read post]
