Search for: "Matter of West v Turner"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 1:42 pm
Turner v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:32 am
West Ranch, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 3:07 pm
The United Kingdom House of Lords has decided to refer the case of West Tankers Inc v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 5:34 am
As the Court recognised in its decision in Hoffmann v Krieg, a decision may relate partly to matters within scope and partly to matters outside - the fact that the former may be said to constitute the principal subject matter of proceedings does not (or at least has never before been understood by the author to) require a decision, often a separate decision, on the latter in the same case to be recognised under the Regulation. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
— Turner Construction Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 1:45 pm
Edited by Coby Turner [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
An advisory opinion handed down 4 September in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) may have signalled an end to the English court's ability to issue anti-suit injunctions against parties who commence parallel litigation in other EC Member State countries.The opinion, in Allianz SpA (formerly Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta SpA) and Others v West Tankers Inc, arises out of the collision of a vessel, owned by West Tankers Inc and chartered to Erg… [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Fred Turner. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 8:59 pm
Native to West, esp. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 9:59 pm
Native to West, esp. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
West Tankers, Points 30 et 29. [12] See M. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
These cases demonstrate clearly the change of position as compared with Allianz v West Tankers and Turner v Grovit, respectively. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
But amidst the intense focus on Reno v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 11:03 pm
As a matter of formality there is probably nothing directly inconsistent between it and West Tankers. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:00 pm
Consistently with its reasoning in Gasser (Case C-116/02) and Turner v Grovit (Case C-259/02), the Court held in West Tankers that “even though proceedings [to enforce an arbitration agreement via an anti-suit injunction] do not come within the scope of [the Brussels I Regulation], they may nevertheless have consequences which undermine its effectiveness”, if they “prevent a court of another Member State from exercising the jurisdiction conferred on it by… [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 1:05 am
” Lozano v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
This was relied on by the Court of Apeal in Vento v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire ([2003] ICR 318) when it gave guidance setting out the “three broad bands” of compensation for injury to feelings. [read post]
5 Sep 2009, 9:08 pm
Steelers v. [read post]
