Search for: "Matter of Westbury Laundromat Inc., v Mammina" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Splash parties are entitled to a reasonable return, not the most profitable return (see id.; Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d at 891). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Splash parties are entitled to a reasonable return, not the most profitable return (see id.; Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d at 891). [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The Splash parties are entitled to a reasonable return, not the most profitable return (see id.; Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d at 891). [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
 Control Bd., 148 AD3d 1141, 1143, quoting Matter of Westbury Laundromat, Inc. v Mammina, 62 AD3d 888, 890 [internal quotation marks omitted]) and the prior issuance of a building permit does not estop a municipality from enforcing its zoning laws. [read post]