Search for: "Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
In the absence of such information, the Board rejected Roberts' medical opinion as not credible, which it was entitled to do (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d at 1237; Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries, 134 AD3d 1321, 1321 [2015]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
In the absence of such information, the Board rejected Roberts' medical opinion as not credible, which it was entitled to do (see Matter of Glowczynski v Suburban Restoration Co., Inc., 174 AD3d at 1237; Matter of Yanas v Bimbo Bakeries, 134 AD3d 1321, 1321 [2015]). [read post]