Search for: "Matter of ZZ"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm
Resolving a split among the four departments of the Appellate Division, the state Court of Appeals last week held that Family Courts have no authority under Social Services Law § 384-b involuntary termination of parental rights proceedings, to order post-TPR contacts between the respondent parent and the child. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:30 am
PART ZZ of A156/S56:
21 Section 1. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
Matter of Findlay, 253 N.Y. 1, 7, 170 N.E. 471 [1930]. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:18 am
Matter of Findlay, 253 N.Y. 1, 7, 170 N.E. 471 [1930]. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:33 am
PART ZZ Section 1. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:21 am
Although Chapter 56 is considered as primarily related to budget matters it contains significant material related to the Rockefeller Law reform initiatives. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:49 am
In the Matter of Hailey ZZ., No. 103, NYLJ 1202558306160, at *1 (June 7, 2012) the Court of Appeals resolved a conflict within the Appellate Divisions as to whether Family Court may direct continuing contact between parent and child once parental rights have been terminated in a contested proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law §384-b, and held that the Family Court lacks this authority. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:44 am
XL Specialty Insurance Company, where the court stated: To resolve the challenge to the expert’s opinion testimony, the Court … conducts a “rigorous” three-part inquiry into whether: (1) the expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodology by which the expert reaches his conclusions is sufficiently reliable; and (3) the testimony assists the trier of fact, through the application of scientific, technical,… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:08 am
Let’s leave aside the point about whether that omission matters, or whether, on the other hand, a reasonable person would have known that the promise of confidentiality would have to yield to a subpoena. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm
Supreme Court is empowered to determine whether defendant is liable to pay no-fault benefits (see Marangiello v Kamak, 64 AD2d 624, 625 [1978]), and whether plaintiff is a proper person to pursue that claim "is an issue separate from the subject matter of the action or proceeding, and does not affect the court's power to entertain the case before it" (Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v Mastropaolo, 42 AD3d 239, 243 [2007]; see Matter of Renee XX. v John… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
The FDA may take further action if the company does not adequately address this matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:51 am
I also personally communicate with dozens Patently-O readers each week on matters of patent examination policy. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
He didn’t enjoy the subject matter. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:53 pm
The Court, however, is never bound to follow any particular recommendation as held in Matter of Erika R., Matter of Jasen P.M. and Matter of Dennis ZZ. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
It was held in the case of Matter of J. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
A well-designed car can save your life (and its well-designed stereo can make ZZ Top's guitar riffs sound like pure gold). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
In August 2010 the claimant discovered that the defendant newspaper had been told of another alleged sexual affair, this time involving a woman named ZZ. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
(2) There is no general exception for cases where private matters are in issue [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:24 am
This Kat has been away from his domestic lair, attending to several personal matters where even his beloved IP became momentarily of minor importance. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:04 pm
You know–back when it didn’t seem like this funny digital thing didn’t matter much. [read post]
