Search for: "Matter of Zelouf"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
The panel will discuss the extent to which family ownership affects disputes in LLCs and other unincorporated entities; whether family businesses are distinctive in ways that are legally relevant; and whether, as a practical matter, the statutory differences between LLCs, corporations, and other forms of business association matter. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
In this Part Two, I’ll highlight a number of other, interesting issues addressed in Zelouf of importance both to business divorce lawyers and business appraisers. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:29 am
” Matter of Seagroatt Floral Co., Inc., 78 NY2d 439, 445 (1991). [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
In Zelouf Int’l Corp. v Zelouf, best known and most often cited for applying a 0% marketability discount in its fair value determination, is the most interesting of the three cases that decided the interest rate. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:32 am
Ramunni was in charge of financial matters including handling of cash receipts, banking, day-to-day authorization of payments, and monitoring of sales. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:32 am
” In Zelouf Intl. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:15 am
As the court explained in Zelouf Intl. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
Freeze-out mergers inherently have a disparate impact on a minority shareholder (see id.) and courts have been liberal in permitting them (see Zelouf v Zelouf, 2013 WL 4734873 [Sup Ct, NY County Aug. 30, 2013] [permitting merger to avoid jury trial]). [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
In Zelouf Intl. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
“Fair value, therefore, is a question of fact” (Zelouf Intern. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
During his years at Farrell Fritz, from time to time Sam served as court-appointed Referee to hear and report in litigated matters. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 3:29 am
During his years at Farrell Fritz, from time to time Sam served as court-appointed Referee to hear and report in litigated matters. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 3:19 am
Considering the ongoing, vigorous debate in legal and valuation circles surrounding the existential propriety of DLOM under the statutory fair value standard, as recently played out in the Zelouf and Giaimo cases, it would have been extremely helpful to other litigants had the Second Department explained why it believed DLOM was inappropriate in Chiu. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:24 am
Even in the few New York cases that have rejected DLOM, such as the recent Zelouf and Chiu decisions, the courts did so, not because of any doctrinal objection to DLOM’s general applicability under the fair value standard, but due to unique circumstances present in those cases. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
“[A]s a matter of economic reality,” wrote the judge, “a hypothetical buyer would be looking for the value of an integrated enterprise to be acquired as a whole, not . . . a purchase of club-by-individual club. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
“[A]s a matter of economic reality,” wrote the judge, “a hypothetical buyer would be looking for the value of an integrated enterprise to be acquired as a whole, not . . . a purchase of club-by-individual club. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
“[A]s a matter of economic reality,” wrote the judge, “a hypothetical buyer would be looking for the value of an integrated enterprise to be acquired as a whole, not . . . a purchase of club-by-individual club. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
I’ve featured on this blog a number of New York stock valuation cases in which the opposing experts offered hugely disparate appraisals, such as the La Verghetta case (enterprise value of $162 million vs. $6.4 million), the AriZona Iced Tea case (enterprise value of $3.2 billion vs. $426 million), and the Zelouf case ($3.8 million vs. $1.3 million for the petitioner’s shares). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
It should if you’re familiar with the Zelouf case previously featured on this blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am
I’ve featured on this blog a number of New York stock valuation cases in which the opposing experts offered hugely disparate appraisals, such as the La Verghetta case (enterprise value of $162 million vs. $6.4 million), the AriZona Iced Tea case (enterprise value of $3.2 billion vs. $426 million), and the Zelouf case ($3.8 million vs. $1.3 million for the petitioner’s shares). [read post]
