Search for: "Matters v. Manufacturers Trust Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 2:33 am
Georgia Malone & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:38 pm
[…] Section 101 reads: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, . . . may obtain a patent therefor. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Co. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:07 pm
A good starting place to discuss the evolution of the patentable subject matter requirement is the landmark 1998 decision State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:25 am
Agency v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 8:04 pm
Davis v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
Under the circumstances of this case, the defendants failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff would not have been able to prove that the premises owner did not, by its own snow and ice removal efforts, create or exacerbate the allegedly dangerous condition which caused the plaintiff's injuries (see Sut v City Cinemas Corp., 71 AD3d 759; Gil v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 39 AD3d 703; see also Robles v City of… [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:44 am
Nash in New York County adopts the Second Department's holding: "Public policy dictates that courts pay particular attention to fee arrangements between attorneys and their clients, as it is important that a fee contract be fair, reasonable, and fully known and understood by the client (see Jacobson v Sassower, 66 NY2d 991, 993, 499 NYS2d 381, 489 NE2d 1283 [1985]; Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 176, 507 NYS2d 610, 499… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 |… [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Laborers’ Pension Trust Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
On conditions for (DELETED) Co. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:21 am
“Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, the scope of the work it performed under the 2008 retainer agreement, which included not only numerous contracts and negotiations but also employment litigation in the U.K., makes it at least reasonable to construe the agreement as authorizing plaintiff to represent Luxury and Hoeksema in the underlying loan action (see Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 68 NY2d 172, 177 [1986] [where there is ambiguity in… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals just gave them a boost in a case recently decided — Lotes Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:28 am
Therefore, defendant’s reading must be adopted (Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Gerber Products Co., No. 3:15-cv-02201, 2016 U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:28 am
Co v. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
