Search for: "Matthews v. Barr" Results 21 - 40 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Orin Kerr flagged two draft chapters he wrote on implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Matthew Astorga, No. 103,083 (Leavenworth)Direct appeal; First-degree murderTheresa L Barr (brief); Meryl Carver-Allmond (argue)Improper instruction restricting self-defenseForcible felony restriction vagueJuror misconduct (failure to disclose)Improper imposition of hard-50State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Elena Chacko analyzed on the Israeli Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tabish v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm by Anna Salvatore
Matthew Kahn analyzed the Supreme Court’s oral arguments in Van Buren v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
For a more complete transcript, see the appendix to Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm by gstasiewicz
Immigration and Customs Enforcement) Chief of Staff Suzanne Barr writes to DHS Deputy Press Secretary Matthew Chandler, “we r f’ed up,” to which Chandler responds, “Yep. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
” Later, Chief Justice John Marshall also was burned in effigy after writing the famous opinion in Marbury v. [read post]