Search for: "Matthews v. State of California (1980)" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Warley Patricia Minter, Western Kentucky University Commentator: Karen Tani, University of California, Berkeley Presidential Address: Navigating Segregated Life in America’s Racial Borderhoods Albert Camarillo, Stanford University  Sunday, April 14Asylum and Sovereignty in the 1970s and 1980s Chair: Jana Lipman, Tulane University  Homefront of the Hostage Crisis: The Contested Status of Iranian Students in the US, Yael Schacher, Harvard University… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:40 am by cdw
”  The remedy the district court sought  to provide the litigants, as the court noted in its  initial order, however, “is not consistent with California state law and procedures. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Pfizer did, but Matthew Panuwat did not seek to profit on that transaction. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The claim was out of limitation and there was no reason as to why section 32A of the Limitation Act 1980 should apply. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am by John Floyd
Matthew and Kathryn came to visit the couple from Sacramento on a fairly regular basis, sometimes staying for extended periods of time during these early 1980 years. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Pacific Legal Foundation and Matthew Sissel Amicus brief of Mortimer Caplin & Sheldon Cohen Amicus brief of Mountain States Legal Foundation Amicus brief of HR Policy Association Petitioner’s reply   Dallas v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Law creates idea that the market is separate from the state. [read post]