Search for: "Maxwell v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
It appears that Merck KGaA (MK) alleged that MSD had infringed its trade mark in the United Kingdom and, while it's not stated explicitly in the note received by this Kat, it looks as though there had been use of the mark but that MSD was arguing that it was a use that was permitted under the terms of the agreement, since MSD was arguing here that the agreement was governed by New Jersey law. [read post]
13 May 2022, 6:00 am
Kim Dotcom says he won’t accept ‘injustice’ and will keep fighting against extradition to the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm
- Hackensack, NJ lawyer Jay McDaniel on his New Jersey Business Dissolution Journal Key Trends in eDiscovery for 2011 - David Kaufer of TERIS on the firm's Sophisticated Litigation Support Blog Another Twombly/Iqbal Victory for Plaintiffs: SCOTUS Denies Certiorari for Digital Music Price-Fixing Case - Philadelphia attorney Maxwell Kennerly of The Beasley Firm at his blog, Litigation & Trial Loss Causation - Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc.… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
Bailey v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm
Batoff of Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel on their HR Legalist Disney’s Influence on United States Copyright Law – Sacramento lawyer Josh H. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
United States, 10-7387. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:11 am
London : Thomson/Sweet & Maxwell, 2010 ccxxx, 1224 p. ; 24 cm. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
United States (relisted after the 9/26 and 10/7 Conferences) Docket: 10-9333 Issue(s): Whether the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States (relisted [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
United States is a 1977 Supreme Court case that addressed the proper standard for pornography convictions. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:03 am
United States is a 1977 Supreme Court case that addressed the proper standard for pornography convictions. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
United States (1944) and Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:11 am
Corporate lawyers » United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:33 am
Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Indeed, reliance on intermediate scrutiny to do the work of the more traditional tests is manifest in such cases as United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm
A federal judge overseeing a civil claim against Ghislaine Maxwell has agreed to unseal court documents related to a 2015 defamation case. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the… [read post]
