Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 61 - 80
of 5,319
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Tornetta et al. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Member states may set a lower percentage. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 2:47 am
Halet v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Information, if any, on the determination of the board of directors on the de-SPAC transaction, the material factors that impacted such determination and any report, opinion or appraisal on the transaction. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
That’s what we may face in finance. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 1:23 pm
Any one of these factors may not have been enough for the court to find a lack of independence. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery held in Icahn v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:05 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
It may be obvious to the board and management how their decision will promote the best interests of the company and its stockholders. [read post]
AI and inventorship guidance: Incentivizing human ingenuity and investment in AI-assisted inventions
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
We have issued guidance for practitioners using AI when practicing before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
Recently, in Segway v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
One day in November 2016, she parked in that lot and boarded the shuttle. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
The court considered both his 21% percent stake, and his “ability to exercise outsized influence in the board room” due to his close personal ties to the directors and his “superstar CEO” status. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
Askanase v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
The question reads as follows: Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”), a party may challenge the validity of a patent in an inter partes review proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) and obtain a decision regarding the patent’s validity. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s landmark 2018 decision Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The presumption may be rebutted by persuasive evidence showing that the merger is unlikely to enhance market power. [read post]
