Search for: "May v. Board of Directors"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 5:05 pm
When a board of directors decides to enter the company into a change-of-control transaction, the board is charged with the duty to act reasonably to secure the best value reasonably attainable for its shareholders. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
Under Delaware law, there are two different tests for determining whether demand may be excused: the Aronson v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:30 am
Cheffins and Bobby V. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 3:08 pm
(quoting Allen v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
The discussion below is based upon the Chancery Court decision in Airgas, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:20 pm
Check out some of our other posts on committees: Everything You Wanted to Know About Nonprofits & CommitteesAdvisory Board v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”[14] On May 13, 2022, Judge Duffy-Lewis—also of the Los Angeles Superior Court—reached a similar conclusion in a second action also titled Crest v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 8:08 am
But after the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 opinion in Marchand v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
In this article, we provide background on these developments and identify five steps that directors may want to consider as they develop risk governance frameworks. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:00 am
Can the board remove directors? [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 12:53 pm
Rywalt v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 4:27 pm
Today, new Director Vidal issued a revised memo to “provide more certainty and predictability in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:42 am
On occasion, such directors may have conflicting loyalties. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
Gates III 80,000 120,000 0 0 200,000 Raymond V. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
For an example of the potential applicability of Section 527.8 to directors, see this opinion issued yesterday by the Fourth District Court of Appeal: North Coast Village Condominium Ass'n. v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 5:15 am
May 5, 2008), a 25% shareholder (and family member) filed a derivative suit. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
Noteworthy costs awards were recently released in Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 232 v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Mueller 258,875 James V. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:06 pm
Executive compensation decisions are core functions of a board of directors and, absent unusual circumstances, are protected by the business judgment rule. [read post]
