Search for: "May v. Commonwealth"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 6:19 pm
Enter B.C. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Exelon The $173 million Exelon settlement arises out of an alleged eight-year bribery scheme by its subsidiary Commonwealth Edison to influence Illinois lawmakers to enact favorable energy legislation. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Arneson, 766 F.3d 774, 796 (8th Cir. 2014); see also Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
In May, shortly before the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:05 pm
In Hyland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:46 am
Selembo v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:05 am
However, an appeal revealed that, according to the recent Supreme Court decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
The complainant, whose identity has been kept confidential, did not receive any physical injuries, though officers have indicated that she may have suffered an “emotional and psychological impact. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Thus, in Lawson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 10:34 am
Unless I'm missing something, Valdez joins the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
Mass.) in Steiner v. eBay, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Supreme Court in the case of Mallory v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:28 am
The Commonwealth has appealed the ruling to the Appeals Court, where the case is currently pending. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:55 am
The Attorney-General of the Commonwealth and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission intervened. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 3:43 pm
(quoting Baker v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 8:58 am
Whilst the offence only applies directly to ‘large’ organisations, we expect that in practice, smaller organisations will still have to consider putting in place, or reinforcing, their anti-fraud procedures – given that they may be the ‘associated person’ of a large organisation (and the large organisation may therefore require them to have in place ‘reasonable procedures’ to prevent fraud). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
He referred to Rev Charles Odeke Akunya v Registered Trustees of Church of Uganda (HCCS No 305 of 2020) and Rev Canon Cyrus Adiga Nakari v Rt Rev Sabino Ocan Odoki (HCSS No 2 of 2017) and cited Justice Mubiru: “… the courts may refrain from adjudicating purely religious matters, save where the right to property or to an office depends on the questions as to religious faith, belief, doctrine or creed as the courts may be handicapped to enter into the… [read post]
