Search for: "May v. Edwards" Results 1 - 20 of 3,613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2024, 8:32 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Over to the team to report on Edwards Lifesciences v Meril GmbH and Meril Life Sciences (UPC_CFI_249/2023:"The Edwards Lifesciences v Meril preliminary injunction (PI) proceedings at the UPC on EP 3 763 331 protecting a “Prosthetic valve crimping device” (see here) started with a bang (or should this UPCKat say, crimp?) [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Northern Ireland A libel claim by Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly against journalist Ruth Dudley Edwards has settled. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 10:55 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Readers who are perplexed about the relevance of the furry creature in the above image might like to read Wombles Ltd v Wombles Skips Ltd [1977] RPC 99.Details:Published: 2024Format: Hardback, EbookExtent: 702 pagesISBN: 978 1 80392 522 6Imprint: Edward Elgar Publishing [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The Yale HSP authors delivered their final report on their case-control study to FDA, in May 2020.[6] The HSP was a study, with 702 HS cases, and over 1,376 controls, men and women, ages 18 to 49. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
At the same time, we’ve been accused of picking winners and losers, stifling innovation, and driving crypto businesses to more favorable, foreign jurisdictions, wherever they may be. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Andrew Lykiardopoulos KC and Henry Edwards of 8 New Square presented the highlights of the 2023 patent cases in the form of a Christmas menu, including culinary delicacies such as Turkey with Apixaban Sauce and Caviar by Ocado. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
In SEC v Capital Gains Research Bureau the US Supreme Court said a pump and dump scheme by an investment adviser violated its fiduciary duty. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
This may include regularly occurring fixed periods of work, although the seasonal or temporary nature of work by itself would not necessarily indicate independent contractor classification. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The Claimant’s application “did not sufficiently advance beyond the speculative, or the optimistic hope that, as a result of further research, disclosure and cross-examination, ‘something may turn up’ to prove what he wants to be able to show. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Minn. 2007) (“[A]n expert may not testify as to ethical issues or to his personal views”; “[t]he question of corporate intent is one for the jury, not for an expert”); Reece v. [read post]