Search for: "May v. Justices" Results 21 - 40 of 52,641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 3:08 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
The court then rejected the union’s argument that the district court may nevertheless have authority to review certain plainly unlawful acts by the FLRA under the Supreme Court’s decision in Leedom v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
’ The judge may also have relied on the affidavit of the plaintiff’s epidemiological expert, Dr. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
Burr (per Chief Justice Marshall, sitting as Circuit Justice); the Nixon tapes case; and Nixon v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
  However, the case would give Justice Gorsuch a chance to more fully connect the federalism canon and MQD (as he began to do in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
Under our system of justice, the accused has a right to be held to account only for the crime charged and, thus, allegations of prior bad acts may not be admitted against them for the sole purpose of establishing their propensity for criminality (see People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901 ]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
Order 8 rule 1 provides: ‘(1) An originating process or other court document may be served out of Singapore with the Court’s approval if it can be shown that the Court has the jurisdiction or is the appropriate court to hear the action. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
The Trump lawyer, in a show of confidence that may either be savvy or a miscalculation, says, “I have nothing further, Your Honor. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
” With four of the court’s conservative justices – Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh – appearing to lean toward some form of immunity for Trump, the ruling may hinge on Roberts, who although relatively quiet seemed dubious about the reasoning of the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]