Search for: "May v. Secretary of Health and Human Services" Results 1 - 20 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2017, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Department of Health and Human Services 16-808 Issue: Whether the Secretary of Health and Human Services may ignore the statutory payment rate for a drug covered under Part B of the Medicare Act and instead cap payments at a physician’s costs to acquire that drug, either directly or under the guise of assessing “medical reasonableness. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:17 am by John Elwood
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 10–1014. [read post]
11 May 2021, 11:44 am by David Bender
On May 10, 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) announced that— consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
Answering a question from a member of Congress, Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia M. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
CARVONDELLA BRADLEY,  et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus SECRETARY, U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:06 am by Jon L. Gelman
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) [The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)] has filed a recovery action in the US District Court in Alabama for recovery of Medicare Secondary Payments (MSP). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., (2015) No. 14-114. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:46 am
LEAVITT, MacKenzie sought to reverse the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services' (the Secretary) determination that it overpaid MacKenzie $508,747.57 in Medicare reimbursement payments for135 power wheelchairs that MacKenzie provided to Medicare recipients. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Gresham, 20-37Issue: Whether the approval by the Secretary of Health and Human Services of the Arkansas Works Amendment was lawful. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm by Bernard Bell
  The Department of Health and Human Services (“HSS”) arguably did just that in promulgating its rule specifying the administrative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process[1] for conflicts between drug makers and certain health care providers. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:22 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
On March 27, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg ruled that Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Azar’s approval of work and community engagement requirements in Arkansas and Kentucky were arbitrary and capricious, halting their implementation. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:49 am
Secretary of Health and Human Services, 774 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1985). [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:15 pm by Medicare Set Aside Services
Following a fall in an AutoZone parking lot, Plaintiff sued the store, the unknown employee who obviously allegedly spilled the oil in question and Medicare (yes Medicare and not the Secretary of Health and Human Services) because it "should pay, did pay or may have paid some of Plaintiff's medical bills from the instant action. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:47 pm
Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., United States Supreme Court, Docket #11-393 In 2010, Congress enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, [124 Stat. 119]. [read post]
The secretary of Health and Human Services has long delegated authority to make the second determination to the FDA commissioner. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 5:39 am
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, ________ F.3d ________, 2006WL 3102315 (11th Cir. 2006). [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm by admin
Section 1135 Waiver Issues and COVID-19 (March 25, 2020):  On January 31, 2020, Secretary Alex Azar, of the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), used his authority under the Public Health Service Act to declare a public health emergency in the United States.[1] Secretary Azar determined that a public health emergency had existed nationwide since January 27, 2020. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:58 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Disclosures of PHI are required only in limited circumstances, such as when required by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to investigate a covered entity’s compliance with the Privacy Rule and to the individual pursuant to the individual’s right of access. [read post]