Search for: "May v. Supreme Court of State of Colorado" Results 221 - 240 of 1,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 3:15 pm
” The court’s decision effectively sanctions similar programs already on the books in six other states and may encourage others to join that group. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 3:15 pm by Mike Aylward
In particular, the court found guidance in the opinions of the state Supreme Court in cases such as Hecla Mining v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As my co-author (Akhil Amar) and I discuss in an Article forthcoming in The Supreme Court Review (a draft of which is available on SSRN here), recent attention concerning ISL theory may have been generated by members of the Supreme Court itself; four Justices, drawing on arguments advanced in the Bush v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:17 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Because the prosecutors never put on a case against him, the state supreme court found, Martinez was never “at risk. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am by Bret Cogdill
Private cause of action - elements – legislative declaration.(1) TO PREVAIL IN A CLAIM BROUGHT UNDER SECTION 6-1-113, A PLAINTIFF SHALL ESTABLISH THAT:(a) THE DEFENDANT ENGAGED IN AN UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICE;(b) THE CHALLENGED PRACTICE OCCURRED IN THE COURSE OF THE DEFENDANT'S BUSINESS, VOCATION, OR OCCUPATION;(c) THE PLAINTIFF SUFFERED INJURY IN FACT TO A LEGALLY PROTECTED INTEREST; AND(d) THE CHALLENGED PRACTICE CAUSED THE PLAINTIFF'S INJURY.(2) THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY… [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In June, the Supreme Court agreed to review this question: Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:26 pm by Patrick J. McMahon
The Colorado Supreme Court, however, held that the employer was within its rights to terminate the employee. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
HB 20-1348 – Additional Liability Under Respondeat SuperiorOn March 17, 2017, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its decision in a case entitled Ferrer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:08 am by David McLain
The Colorado Supreme Court has indicated that a CCPA violation requires proof that the defendant knowingly engaged in a deceptive trade practice.[1] Colorado Court of Appeals panels have subsequently interpreted “bad faith” conduct to require an intent to deceive, or a finding that defendant knew or should have known its actions were deceiving. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:21 am by David M. McLain
 The Colorado Supreme Court has indicated that a CCPA violation requires proof that the defendant knowinglyengaged in a deceptive trade practice.[1]  Colorado Court of Appeals panels have subsequently interpreted “bad faith” conduct to require an intent to deceive, or a finding that defendant knew or should have knownits actions were deceiving. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 5:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) On January 15, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in McCullen v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am by Derek T. Muller
I’ve taken a day to chew over the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. [read post]