Search for: "Mays v. Clark"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2017, 11:33 am
It is reasonable to anticipate that Clarke will now argue those matters on remand. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:13 am
" Barry v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 2:16 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clarke, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 921 (14 May 2009) Pedley & Ors v R [2009] EWCA Crim 840 (14 May 2009) Pitchfork, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 963 (14 May 2009) Hughes v R [2009] EWCA Crim 841 (14 May 2009) Bamber, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 962 (14 May 2009) Court of Appeal [...] [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:02 am
Harmony School Corporation v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:43 pm
Mcintyre Machinery v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:40 pm
Let’s assume that the Supreme Court holds in Ohio v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:40 pm
Let’s assume that the Supreme Court holds in Ohio v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
(Keeton v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:08 am
Read an analysis of the merit decision in Ohio v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:53 am
MONEY LEFT IN IRA AT TIME OF PASSING NOT SUBJECT TO NORMAL IRA RULES This blog previously discussed the Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:42 pm
Garretson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:42 pm
Also this fall, a Lufkin jury in Judge Ron Clark's court returned a verdict for the plaintiff in Ariba v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:21 pm
Judge Tangeman (up in San Luis Obispo) did the right thing, and granted a new trial on damages when the jury pretty clearly awarded attorney Clark Fergus a $1.2 million contingency fee even though they were expressly instructed that Fergus was only entitled to a reasonable (hourly) fee.But while he was right on the merits (in my view), he was wrong on procedure, and issued his factual findings supporting the grant of a new trial 15 days after the verdict, rather than within 10 days. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
Here are some thoughts on the Clark case prompted by reading the reply brief. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
Here are some thoughts on the Clark case prompted by reading the reply brief. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 10:05 pm
App. 4th 116 (2008) (Kullar) and Clark v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
United States may be so intellectually stimulating that nobody seems to have noticed that the case has been fundamentally misframed”: Law professor Conor Clarke has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:02 pm
District Court alleging multiple state and federal counts against then Police Commissioner Kevin Clark and other parties. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
Clark? [read post]
13 May 2010, 8:25 am
In Personal Audio v. [read post]
