Search for: "Mays v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
Director, Office of WorkersCompensation Programs, solely on “situs of injury” determinations that have nothing to do with the causal issue. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm by G. Blane Clark
Payroll costs may include compensation to owner-employees and self-employed individuals. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:07 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Biden criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer works, publishes and speaks extensively on wage and hour, worker classification and other human resources and workforce, employee benefits, compensation, internal controls and related matters. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Meanwhile, Director for EEOC’s Fresno Local Office Melissa Barrios warned, “Employers must try to accommodate individuals with disabilities by exploring effective ways to allow them to work provided there is no undue hardship. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Righting for the Supreme Court Majority, Justice Kennedy explained that ERISA expressly pre-empts “any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm by Michael Cook
  From an agency perspective, government rates generally are low, thus furthering the need to retain workers at low wage levels and the needs of elderly and disabled clients can be extremely challenging. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm by Bexis
Director, Office of Worker’s Compensation Programs, 604 F.3d 864, 872 (5th Cir. 2010) (“the letter of the law shall not be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing its spirit”); Combs v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]