Search for: "Mays v. Hines"
Results 201 - 213
of 213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm
" People v Hines, 97 NY2d at 61.Subsequently, as discussed in detail here, the Court of Appeals, relying on Hines has held in People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, that a defendant's legal sufficiency arguments are not properly preserved for appellate review unless a motion for a trial order of dismissal is renewed at the close of all proof:After defendant presented his own evidence, he did not renew his earlier argument. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 10:44 am
Recently in Heffner v Little Lady (08 IWCC 510, May 2008) the Commission also denied inclusion of the overtime hours for a maintenance supervisor where the overtime hours were not shown to be mandatory or part of the regular hours of employment.In reading the case law, it looks like the definition for exclusion of overtime under Section 10 is much more easily defined than in considering all the situations where overtime hours might or should be included in calculation of wages. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Hansen The recent decision by the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three in Hines v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:19 pm
Hines, 2008 Md. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 08, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:28 am
Hines, 40 AD3d 903 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
Hines v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 4:26 am
Hines, 449 F.3d 808 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
Ass'n. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 1980); Hines v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:37 pm
Coopervision, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:54 pm
Coopervision, Inc. v. [read post]
