Search for: "Mays v. INA" Results 41 - 60 of 472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
That issue was front and center after the Supreme Court, in Haitian Centers Council v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
That issue was front and center after the Supreme Court, in Haitian Centers Council v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
That issue was front and center after the Supreme Court, in Haitian Centers Council v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:33 pm
This was sufficient to plead a RICO predicate act based on the INA provision that prohibited encouraging or inducing.Finally, knowingly providing an illegal alien with employment, an assumed identity, an assumed Social Security number, and cash-based pay—all for the purpose of concealing, harboring, and shielding them from detection—was sufficient to establish a RICO predicate act based on a violation of the fourth INA provision.The text of the April 9, 2010 decision in… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:12 am by Peter Margulies
The Supreme Court has regularly issued decisions that clarify the scope of various aggravated felony provisions in the INA (see Moncrieffe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
In May 2016, it filed for reorganization and protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 5:50 am by Josh Blackman
But the APA requires only that "the agency's path may reasonably be discerned. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Peter Margulies
In appropriate cases, the government may enhance “procedures” for visa processing in particular countries, under another provision of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(1)(B). [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 9:12 am
Each waiver of inadmissibility for nonimmigrants authorized under INA § 212(d)(3) should specify: (i) the reasons for inadmissibility; (ii) the intended date of arrival and departure, unless the authorization is valid for multiple entries; (iii) if applicable, the length of each stay authorized in the United States;(iv) the purpose of each stay;(v) the number of entries for which the authorization is valid;(vi) the justification for the waiver; and(vii) that the waiver is… [read post]
9 May 2019, 8:44 am by Peter Margulies
Under current judicial rulings regarding the federal court settlement in the Flores v. [read post]