Search for: "Mays v. Sprinkle et al" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 7:14 am by Elie Mystal
VS Holding Co. et al (10cv4038) – consolidated antitrust actions – “going once, twice, sold to the lowest bidder” – ready to rumble? [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (The Hearing Clinic (Niagara Falls) Inc. v. 866073 Ontario Limited, et al., 2014 ONSC 5831) “…but much of the rest of the 89 pages of testimony resembles a comedy routine that might have been inspired by Monty Python’s Flying Circus. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
” The message to marketers: Don’t sprinkle a few adjectives here and there and expect them to undo the net impression conveyed to the buying public. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
” These verbal fillers typically operate under the radar and may be missed or, more often, excised by the conscientious court reporter. [read post]