Search for: "McCONNELL v. DAVIS" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:06 am by Jonah Gelbach
The WSJ column by Saving to which McConnell links assumes this is true, based on Saving's discussion of the 1937 Supreme Court opinion in Helvering v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That is, even as Republicans have largely won their decades-long war against labor unions in the private sector (allowing most private companies to quickly drop their pension plans), the public sector is the one remaining stronghold of workers’ power.This issue arose in 2018’s Janus v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:28 am by Charles Davis
The Supreme Court in 2003 upheld the BCRA’s limitations against a facial attack — a claim that a statute is unconstitutional in all of its possible applications — in McConnell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:48 pm by Kedar
On the other hand, McConnell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
Helms (1999) -- direct aid to religious schools Davis v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2023 Tags: Acquisitions, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Wachtell Lipton Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Emmerich and Robin Panovka, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, January 7, 2023 Tags: Acquisitions, Board of Directors, Corporate governance, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Wachtell Lipton Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments Posted by Haimavathi V. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
With Bexis and McConnell now at Reed Smith, we’ve gained access to Reed’s database on the ubiquitous plaintiffs’ expert Dr. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:09 am
Davis (2001) -- prohibiting indefinite detention of immigrants under final orders of removal where no other country will accept themEasley v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
”  And at the Huffington Post, Brennan Center attorney Monica Youn responds to comments made on the Senate floor last week by Senator Mitch McConnell, who criticized Kagan’s support of the government’s position in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 5:04 am by Nate Persily
Citizens United represents just the latest retrenchment since McConnell v. [read post]