Search for: "McCarthy v. Elections Board"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
McCarthy led Republicans in the 2022 midterm election cycle on a platform that emphasized a robust oversight agenda. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:59 pm
Joseph McCarthy for conduct that “tended to bring the Senate into dishonor and disrepute. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
In particular, Judge Hellerstein wants to consider the election exclusion under Rule 14a-8(i)(8), which holds that a company may exclude a proposal "[i]f the proposal relates to a nomination or an election for membership on the company's board of directors or analogous governing body or a procedure for such nomination or election. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
It was held in Berkemer v McCarthy that there is no requirement, statutory or otherwise, that a DWI suspect submits to field sobriety tests. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 3:44 pm
This decision was premised on the wording of Section 70.4 which was interpreted to give the user an election whether to accept or reject the license. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 3:08 am
Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm
Check out relevant job openings on our Job Board. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm
The Board of Elections shortly thereafter issued a certificate to Razzano indicating that he was in fact registered to vote in McCarthy’s district. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
McCarthy (Georgia Superior Court; decided September 16, 2011). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:19 am
Board of Educ. for Mexico Cent. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Melton Enterprises Ltd v Censorship of Publications Board [2003] 3 IR 623, [2003] IESC 55 (4 November 2003), the Supreme Court upheld the power in section 9 of the Censorship of Publications Act, 1946 (also here) to prohibit the publication of indecent or obscene periodicals. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Board of Educ. for Mexico Cent. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm
Bobby Chesney explained a factual dispute related to the merits in Doe v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:45 am
Mandatory retirement provisions within partnership agreements do not violate labour laws or human rights, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled today in McCormick v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:00 am
When I became a member of the ACLU’s National Board, I saw President Dorsen in action and admired his ability to wrangle a large and often rambunctious group of civil libertarians at board meetings. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh reports that the court “on Monday declined to hear the appeal of a Missouri school district over its at-large school board elections, which a federal appeals court struck down last year as a violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
