Search for: "McConnel, Matter of" Results 61 - 80 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 7:38 pm
Of course McConnell sees the creation of the recording as a "left-wing, Nixon-esque plot" against the GOP leader... as usual - trying hard to play the victim in the matter. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:10 pm by Howard Wasserman
Michael Dorf explains that the lack of legal basis might not matter, while Neil Buchanan explains how some stupid mischief could play out without success on January 6, which may explain why Mitch McConnell has discovered his limit on cravenness. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:32 am by Howard Wasserman
In fairness, maybe Republicans such as Mitch McConnell never believed that corporations should be able to "speak," only that they should be able to spend money (by giving it... [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 5:23 am by Joe Patrice
* Amid reports (from Fox News no less) that Mitch McConnell does not presently have the votes to confirm Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court took the precaution of removing several contentious matters from their long conference agenda lest. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:50 am by Jack Goldsmith
  Was it right for these people to speak to Woodward about these matters? [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:09 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Stanford law professor, and former Circuit Court of Appeals judge, Michael McConnell has a thoughtful op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal offering his thoughts on the public campaign to pressure Chief Justice Roberts to vote to uphold the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 7:50 am
However, fleeing a police officer only complicates matters for a defendant accused of driving under the influence. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Whichever approach Congress takes is less important than that the revised statute be unambiguous about how the matter is to be resolved. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I think that's not right as a matter of Free Exercise Clause precedent, which (at least as the Court interpreted it in Employment Division v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 10:22 am by Tom Smith
Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.) tweeted.Why it matters: Democrats are enraged by GOP hypocrisy of rushing through a new justice for President Trump after stalling President Obama's final nominee. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:50 am by JB
Therefore McConnell was willing to let this particular legislation go forward. [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
When pressed about tax expenditures, McConnell not surprisingly sidestepped the issue. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm by Josh Blackman
And the nature of the business conducted at those ordinary sessions — whether, for example, Senators must vote on nominations, or may return to their home States to meet with their constituents — is a matter for the Senate to decide. [read post]
The basic thrust of the Establishment Clause is that matters of deep, personal conviction should be left to individual choice. [read post]