Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy" Results 221 - 240 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Anna Christensen
McCoy (09-329) Friday, August 27: Appellants’ brief in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 3:08 am
"The cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrued when the defendant allegedly failed to advise the plaintiff of her equitable distribution rights and failed to disclose a conflict of interest (see Venturella-Ferretti v Kinzler, 306 AD2d 465, 466; see also Zorn v Gilbert, 8 NY3d 933, 934; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 305). [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed, not when it is discovered” (Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d at 735; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 301; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086; Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d at 796). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed, not when it is discovered” (Alizio v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 126 AD3d at 735; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d at 301; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086; Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164; Landow v Snow Becker Krauss, P.C., 111 AD3d at 796). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:15 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Below is today's contract law Appellate Court opinion:AC32082 - McCoy v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:34 am
Furthermore, an attorney may be liable for his ignorance of the rules of practice, his failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, his neglect to prosecute an action, or his failure to conduct adequate legal research (see McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592 [1999]). [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, there was not a “mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 306 [2002]). [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:25 pm
Jake Brigance (Time to Kill) v. 3. [read post]