Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy" Results 301 - 320 of 614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2009, 6:17 am
The trial court granted B of A's motion for judgment on the pleadings, and the plaintiff appealed.The Court of Appeal held: (1) As held in McCoy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002]; Quinn v McCabe, Collins, McGeough & Fowler, LLP, 138 AD3d at 1086). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP, 188 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2020], quoting McCoy, 99 NY2d at 301, citing King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy reports that in McCoy v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:12 am by Anna Christensen
McCoy, Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:24 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This jurisprudential approach was on display in Seila Law v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 3:55 pm by Anna Christensen
McCoy, Ortho Biotech Products v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legalresearch (see, Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006; McCoy v Tepper, 26 1 AD2d 592; Gardner v Jacon,148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645,646). [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:42 am by David DePaolo
 In the meantime California lien claimants challenging SB 863 were thrown out of the Supreme Court of the United States with a no comment "writ denied," the final grasp for straw over.On Monday, the court denied the petition for certiorari in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:55 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Oklahoma Indian Welfare Act – Trust Funds) McCoy v. [read post]