Search for: "McCoy v. McCoy"
Results 81 - 100
of 614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
McCoy, 156 A.2d 307 (Pa. 1959). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:03 pm
McCoy, 174 N.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:14 am
William McCoy, a managing director at Morgan Stanley, described a number of commitments his firm has made towards a carbon neutral future. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Weiss v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:42 am
Wade could be challenged”: Kevin McCoy of USA Today has this report. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 4:02 pm
” And Josh Salman and Kevin McCoy of USA Today report that “Supreme Court nominee Amy Barrett signed anti-abortion letter accompanying ad calling to overturn Roe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 6:17 am
Harbison or McCoy v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:24 pm
This jurisprudential approach was on display in Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:36 am
It’s the case that has turned into a modern day Hatfield versus McCoy – McGee v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must allege that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession,” and that the “breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295,… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
The Court stated, “Feuds can metastasize into the Hatfields and McCoys or the Montagues and Capulets. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:43 am
Here’s Act V. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:30 am
“”In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99… [read post]
22 May 2020, 5:35 pm
The defendant indisputably still gets to control whether he pleads guilty and/or have his counsel admit the offense at trial.)So, yes, the Court of Appeal is right that "this is not a case like McCoy where the defendant emphatically insisted he was innocent and consistently told his attorney to argue such at trial. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:00 am
The Court stated, “Feuds can metastasize into the Hatfields and McCoys or the Montagues and Capulets. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:54 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
