Search for: "McCurry v. State"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm
On June 24, 2010, the Washington Supreme Court issued its opinion in McCurry v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 8:16 am
The Washington Court in McCurry v. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 4:58 pm
McCurry v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:20 am
McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 101 S. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:34 pm
On June 24, the Washington Supreme Court decided McCurry v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980) (citing Montana v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
McCurry, No. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:05 am
-Liz McCurry- [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
See [State Farm Mutual v] Hanania, [261 So. 3d 684] at 687 [Fla. 1st DCA 2018]. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:48 pm
McCurry, 303 F. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
(Spicy IP) ‘Tirupati laddus’ granted registration as a geographical indication (Spicy IP) Malaysia Malaysian Federal Court: McDonald’s final defeat by McCurry in trade mark battle (IPKat) Netherlands District Court of The Hague: Procter & Gamble companies win trade mark infringement summary proceedings brought by Debonairre against their Naomi Campbell product line (Class 46) South Africa Copycat success - Supreme… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
(IPKat) United States US General Third IP cross-retaliation strike against USA at WTO (Excess Copyright) World Economic Forum survey: US 18th in global IP protection (Intellectual Property Watch) Funds for US State Department global IP enforcement training (Intellectual Property Watch) Changes in USPTO senior management (Patent Docs) US Patents PatentFreedom to offer subscription-based reexam service to attack NPE patents (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
McCurry, the White House press secretary, to rule out the possibility that Mr. [read post]
