Search for: "McDonald v. Strong" Results 141 - 160 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2010, 8:34 pm
 Some strong supporters of the right to bear arms (understood post-Heller/McDonald as an individual right)  think that all people who are eligible to carry firearms should carry firearms. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am by Charon QC
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The ABC managing director, David Anderson, has mounted a strong defence of Louise Milligan’s reporting on Christian Porter, saying her journalism was in the public interest and of the “highest quality”. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Patrick Bumatay's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc today in Mai v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:52 am by Arturo Jara
The “V” initially stands out, but upon second glance, the “M” is revealed. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
The respondents, represented by Alan Gura, the counsel who won the court’s two Second Amendment blockbusters McDonald v. [read post]