Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 21 - 40
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
Another chapter in the A-12 story has just been published by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, this McDonnell Douglas Corp. and General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Claims of whistleblower retaliation filed under labor laws in California are going to be weighed by the standard set forth in that law, rather than the more stringent burden-shifting test that was laid out in the 1973 case of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Am., Inc., 715 F.3d 102.** McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Am., Inc., 715 F.3d 102.** McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Through application of the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Through application of the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:13 am
Through application of the three-part burden shifting analysis developed in McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 11:37 am
Title VII cases rise or fall on the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting analysis (so-named for McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
” McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:50 pm
LSI Corp. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
In McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 6:17 am
Unisys Corp. and em [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
.** Petitioner, contending the district court failed to properly consider his evidence and improperly credited evidence submitted by Defendant, appealed the district court's ruling.The Second Circuit Court of Appeals said that in considering Petitioner’s Title VII retaliation claim, it employ the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
She can do so in a variety of ways, one of which is by navigating the now-familiar three-part burden-shifting framework established by the Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 9:12 pm
In a case of first-impression, the Sixth Circuit held that the burden-shifting framework (commonly referred to as the McDonnell Douglas/Burdine test) used in cases brought under Title VII does not apply to Title VII mixed-motive cases. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:20 pm
Although the burden shifted to the defendant under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
"Under the burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
McDonnell, vice chair of WUSTL’s Board of Trustees and retired chairman of the board of McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
