Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corporation"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Federal: The Second Circuit holds that to survive summary judgment on a Title VII disparate treatment claim, a plaintiff may satisfy the third stage of the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test by providing evidence that even if the employer had mixed motives, the plaintiff’s membership in a protected class was at least one motivating factor in the employer’s adverse action. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm
But does she have what it takes to satisfy her third-stage burden under the McDonnell Douglas test? [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Amicus Curiae): Jane M. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
q=respectfully+ An employer’s unilaterally adopted policy providing health insurance benefits to employees upon retirement may be rescinded with respect to employees retiring after the effective of the rescission http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_08686.htm Anatomy of an administrative disciplinary decision http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_01764.htm Appeals involving efforts to remove a member of a school board from office… [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
q=respectfully+ An employer’s unilaterally adopted policy providing health insurance benefits to employees upon retirement may be rescinded with respect to employees retiring after the effective of the rescission http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_08686.htm Anatomy of an administrative disciplinary decision http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_01764.htm Appeals involving efforts to remove a member of a school board from office… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:45 pm
The theme for this year is tort law as a response to corporate wrongdoing. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 7:21 pm
(McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am
McDonnell Douglas’ Fatal Third Level PPG asked the court to dismiss Lawson’s claim without trial under the McDonnell Douglas test. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
Others continued applying the old McDonnell Douglas standard despite the new code section. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 4:22 pm
However, in 2003, the state legislature introduced the section 1102.6 standard in reaction to several high-profile corporate scandals and coverups. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 6:06 am
See, e.g., Graham v Long Island RR, 230 F.3d 34, 40 (2d Cir. 2000); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:00 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp., 762 F.2d 1161, 1172 (4th Cir. 1985). [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:00 am
" * McDonnell Douglas Corp.v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
No Sex Bias Claim Because Employee Fails to Meet Employer’s Expectations To establish a disparate treatment discrimination claim, an employee must provide direct evidence of bias, which Gibson didn’t allege, or establish circumstantial evidence to show a violation under the McDonnell Douglas standard. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
No Sex Bias Claim Because Employee Fails to Meet Employer’s Expectations To establish a disparate treatment discrimination claim, an employee must provide direct evidence of bias, which Gibson didn’t allege, or establish circumstantial evidence to show a violation under the McDonnell Douglas standard. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court rejected both interpretations of the PDA’s second clause.In the Young ruling (which is analyzed in greater detail here and here), the Court adapted the McDonnell-Douglas framework, which provides a basis for smoking out discriminatory intent when the employer denies it, for pregnancy accommodation claims. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:46 pm
Accordingly, the complaining party must come forward with “direct evidence” of racial discrimination or satisfy the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting scheme. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 4:29 am
In reviewing the matter, the higher court noted that the McDonnell-Douglas burden shifting paradigms did not apply, once the jury heard the case. [read post]
10 May 2017, 9:29 am
A judge or jury must then decide what the real reason for the firing was.The Supreme Court laid out the framework for adjudicating such cases in its 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
