Search for: "McGee v. Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am by INFORRM
Also on 17 July 2023, Collins Rice J granted judgment in default to the claimant and McGee v Lewis [2023] EWHC 1813 (KB). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
On 13 July 2023 there was a hearing in the harassment case of McGee v Lewis before Collins Rice J. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
Nevertheless, the Irish courts have acknowledged that the law protects reasonable expectations of privacy CRH plc v Competition and Consumer Protection Commission [2017] IESC 34 (29 May 2017) [32] (Charleton J)), albeit that it does so by means of a (constitutional) tort of invasion of privacy (the leading case is Kennedy v Ireland [1987] IR 587 (doc | pdf) (Hamilton P); on the juridical nature of such a claim, see now McGee… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Absolute immunity,** explained the court, protects government officials, such as Respondent, "with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which come within the ambit of those duties," citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Clark v McGee, 49 NY2d 613, the Appellate Division said that Defendants' statements to which Plaintiff objected "were absolutely privileged" noting that if an absolute privilege defense prevails it affords complete immunity from liability for alleged defamation to "an official [who] is a principal executive of State or local government ... with respect to statements made during the discharge of those responsibilities about matters which… [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief… [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
Visit the Marler Clark sponsored Web site about Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome for more information. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
Visit the Marler Clark sponsored Web site about Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome for more information. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]