Search for: "McGhee v Odell" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 4:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The motion court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to amend its answer (see Murray v City of New York, 43 NY2d 400, 404-405 [1977]; McGhee v Odell, 96 AD3d 449, 450 [2012]; CPLR 3025[b]). [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Leave to amend pleadings should be freely given unless there is prejudice or surprise resulting from the delay to the opposing party or if the proposed amendment is “palpably improper or insufficient as a matter of law” (McGhee v Odell, 96 AD3d 449, 450 [1st Dept 2012]) In this case, the City proposes to amend its complaint nearly four years after filing this lawsuit, following 28 party depositions after extensive document discovery which extensive document… [read post]