Search for: "McGinnis v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 12:10 am
That's the Ford v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:56 am
Miller Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Los Angeles Times reports on the introduction by Senator Jim Webb of a new bill, the Military Service Integrity Act, in response to the Court’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:26 am
The information secured on the recent Pike County verdicts is, as follows:PIKE COUNTY VERDICTS(Updated 5/4/09)MCGINNIS V. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 7:55 am
Ditto if your main judicial goal is overruling Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:18 pm
Montana Department of Revenue, which is likely to lead to the invalidation of Blaine Amendments barring state assistance to religious schools in 37 states; he also voted with the majority in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Gienapp uses the example of the Virgina 1782 Case of the Prisoners (Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
McGinnis, Religion Policy and the Faith-Based Initiative: Navigating the Shifting Boundaries between Church and State, (Forum on Public Policy, No. 4, December 2010).Jeffrey Shulman, Introduction to 'Who Owns the Soul of the Child? [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
See Dobbs v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
The district court case is Motorola Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:50 am
Wade, Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 6:09 pm
Here we can state with some confidence only that when a house votes, the Constitution requires that a majority be able to repeal an existing rule. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:29 pm
Madison, Justice Joseph Story in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, and the modern Supreme Court in Edmond v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:29 am
Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has licensed virtually unlimited expansion of federal criminal law in cases such as Gonzalez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:26 am
In the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
First, Sosa v. [read post]
