Search for: "McGrath v. McGrath" Results 1 - 20 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2008, 1:37 am
McGrath and others v Riddell and another [2008] UKHL 21; [2008] WLR (D) 101 “If the country of the principal winding up of an insolvent company was a designated "relevant country" for the purposes of s 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986 and the insolvency laws of that country would involve a pari passu distribution of assets to ordinary unsecured creditors, then an English court should accede to a request to remit assets located in England to the principal… [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 2:11 am
McGrath and Others v Riddell and Another House of Lords “The fact that in a country of principal winding-up of a company in liquidation there would be a class of preferential creditors who would not have priority under English insolvency law was insufficient reason for an English court to refuse to exercise its discretion, under section 426 of the Insolvency Act 1986, to order remission of assets located in England to the country of principal winding-up. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
A unanimous appeal verdict but a divergence of reasoning characterise the Law Lords' speeches in McGrath and another v Riddell and others [2008] UKHL 21. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 3:24 pm
McGrath, No. 06-16533 (9-16-08). [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 12:44 am
R (on the application of Gentle (FC) and another (FC)) (Appellants) v The Prime Minister and others (Respondents) [2008] UKHL 20 (9 April 2008) McGrath and another (Appellants) and others v Riddell and others (Respondents) McGrath and another and others (Appellants) v Riddell and others (Respondents) (Conjoined Appeals) [2008] UKHL 21 (9 April 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:45 am
You may recall that we blogged on HIH Insurance (McGrath v Riddell) back in April 2008. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:06 am by admin
Matter of McGrath v D’Angio 2011 NY Slip Op 05070 Decided on June 7, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The second Department affirmed the decision of the family court Support Magistrate not to recuse herself from a support petition proceeding. [read post]