Search for: "McGuire v. McGuire" Results 41 - 60 of 534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees before the completion of their required probationary period as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for… [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" * In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals held that “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law, or the decision was made in bad… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division dismissed Retiree's Article 78 petition.Citing Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division ruled that the Authority's denial of Retiree's request was not arbitrary and capricious as:1. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division dismissed Retiree's Article 78 petition.Citing Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division ruled that the Authority's denial of Retiree's request was not arbitrary and capricious as:1. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:09 am by Public Employment Law Press
"It would have been more accurate had the appointing authority indicated that there were 25 days remaining in the employee's probationary period and that although he had completed his minimum period of probation, he had not yet attained tenure in the position and thus the employee, although appointed to the position as a permanent employee, was not entitled to a Civil Service Law §75 pretermination hearing or an equivalent disciplinary procedure set out in the controlling… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:09 am by Public Employment Law Press
"It would have been more accurate had the appointing authority indicated that there were 25 days remaining in the employee's probationary period and that although he had completed his minimum period of probation, he had not yet attained tenure in the position and thus the employee, although appointed to the position as a permanent employee, was not entitled to a Civil Service Law §75 pretermination hearing or an equivalent disciplinary procedure set out in the controlling… [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Knopf v Esposito  2019 NY Slip Op 33468(U) November 27, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150315/2019 Judge: Gerald Lebovits. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:58 am by admin
McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 69 & n.1 (1991) (noting “the trial court guarded against possible misuse of the instruction by specifically advising the jury that the ‘[prior injury] evidence, if believed, was not received, and may not be considered by you[,] to prove that [McGuire] is a person of bad character or that he has a disposition to commit crimes’”); Huddleston v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
Facebook users in Australia will be able to report fake ads after scammers used unauthorised images of celebrities including Karl Stefanovic, Nicole Kidman and Eddie McGuire. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, tenure may be acquired in consideration of certain military service performed during a probationary period or by other lawful process.York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, sets out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons,… [read post]