Search for: "McGuire v. McGuire"
Results 161 - 180
of 534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2007, 2:23 am
ANDRIAS, J.P., SULLIVAN, CATTERSON, McGUIRE, ... [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
The second case was Cox v NAP Constr. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:40 am
Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Gonzalez, McGuire, JJ. ... [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division dismissed Retiree's Article 78 petition.Citing Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division ruled that the Authority's denial of Retiree's request was not arbitrary and capricious as:1. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
Removal of a public officer from his or her position by operation of law Greene v McGuire, 683 F.2d 32 §30 of the Public Officers Law provides for the automatic removal of an individual from his or her public office under certain conditions. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:16 pm
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division dismissed Retiree's Article 78 petition.Citing Matter of Peckham v Calogero, 12 NY3d 424, the Appellate Division ruled that the Authority's denial of Retiree's request was not arbitrary and capricious as:1. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 8:31 am
McGuire v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 2:29 am
SAXE, J.P., FRIEDMAN, SWEENY, McGUIRE, MALONE, ... [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:23 pm
Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, McGuire, JJ. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation* and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation* and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
" The Plaintiffs in Allcorn v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:44 pm
Whited, 859 N.E.2d 657(Ind.2007) and McGuire v. [read post]
