Search for: "McGuire v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:41 pm
McGuire, 502 U. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 12:32 pm
Indeed, Andrew Cohen notes, just few months ago, Justice Scalia, during oral argument in Hall v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:23 pm
People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, the Attorney General of the State of New York, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
Justice McGuire dissented, following the Court of Appeals' holdings. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:36 pm
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:16 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:16 am
¶15 (quoting NACCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:15 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
Arkansas, to Yeager v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:51 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 1:31 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment status of a public employee while he or she is serving a probationary… [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
., Local 1000, AFSCME AFL-CIO v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 174 AD3d 1206 [CSEA] and, similarly, in Ayers v City of Mount Vernon, Appellate Division, Second Department, 2019 NY Slip Op 07230 [Ayers], it appears that there some misunderstanding or misapplication of the words of art "permanent appointment" and "tenure" in determining the employment status of a public employee while he or she is serving a probationary… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a lethal injection drug protocol in Baze v. [read post]
