Search for: "McInerney v McInerney" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2009, 2:02 am
Regina v Rollins; Regina v McInerney Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The power of the Financial Services Authority to prosecute offences went beyond those referred to in sections 401 and 402 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and, in particular, it had the power to prosecute offences contrary to sections 327 and 328 of [...] [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:58 am
Regina v Rollins; Regina v McInerney “The Financial Services Authority had the power to prosecute offences beyond those referred to in ss 401 and 402 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and, in particular, it had the power to prosecute for offences contrary to ss 327 and 328 of the Proceeds of Crime [...] [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In a January 7, 2016 Order without Opinion in the case of Arabatlian v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 8:48 pm
A new version of the LEED rating system (LEED 2009 or LEED v.3) was released for public comment in May 2008. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:35 pm by Lyle Roberts
In Wasa Medical Holdings v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April… [read post]