Search for: "McKelvey v. United States Army, Secretary of"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2011, 12:24 pm
Secretary of United States Army highlights the plight of many disabled veterans returning to the civilian work force and presents a lesson for employers on how not to address those issues. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:45 am
In McKelvey v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm
Secretary of United States Army, No. 10-1172 (Dec. 14, 2011). [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:48 am
See, e.g., McKelvey v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:43 am
Affirming the fee award, a Sixth Circuit panel explained that accepting the lower offer was one measure of success (or lack thereof), that Rule 68 did not conflict with the fee-shifting statute at issue, and that the reduction was reasonable (McKelvey v Secretary of United States Army, September 18, 2014, Sutton, J). [read post]
