Search for: "McKenna v. McKenna" Results 121 - 140 of 662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  So too w/litigation/cancellation.Mark McKenna: is there a big problem here? [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
On June 27, Rose Porter picked up a whole hog from Stewart’s Meats in McKenna, Washington. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 11 July 2019 Master Cook handed down judgment in the case of Osagie v Serco Ltd and Ors [2019] EWHC 1803 (QB). [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am by INFORRM
Neither right takes precedence over the other and resolution of the conflict requires an “intense focus on the facts” as per the decision in McKennitt v Ash. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Consider Milstein v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But if TM law is a law of competition, that matters; why be so comfortable w/allowing parties opportunistic definitions in litigation v. mark definition? [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
New from the University of Chicago Press (and a collection that this blogger has been eagerly awaiting): Shaped by the State: Toward a New Political History of the Twentieth Century (2019), edited by Brent Cebul (University of Pennsylvania), Lily Geismer (Claremont McKenna College), and Mason B. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
McKenna Adjunct, School of Graduate Studies Dalhousie University In CLLR 43:2 The Unfulfilled Promise of Press Freedom in Canada. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:30 am by Donna Sokol
Justice Clarence Thomas cited the Law Library’s A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation website in his dissent regarding search and seizure of cellphone location records in Carpenter v. [read post]