Search for: "McKenna v. McKenna"
Results 161 - 180
of 662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
Keeble v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
INS v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:59 pm
Gibson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Canadian case: Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 5:32 am
Equinox Hotel Management, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 9:16 am
” The facts of McKenna v Singer (decided July 31, 2017) are too dense for meaningful summary and if you want a deep dive then read the forty page Court recitation, but the bottom line was that one of the former pair of entrepreneurs was allowed to take the deal for himself. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:19 am
On 21 December 2017, the last day of the English High Court term, Arnold J issued a short judgment in the case of Union Des Associations Européennes de Football (better known as UEFA) v BT and Os [2017] EWHC 3414 (Ch), available on Bailii here. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:25 pm
McKenna v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 1:57 pm
(Roe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
Langella, P.C., 119 AD3d 636, 638), by proving “a case within a case” (McKenna v Forsyth & Forsyth, 280 AD2d 79, 82 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
Mark McKenna and I, with other trademark professors, have written a brief in the ASTM case. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:25 am
People seem to think that Justice Joseph McKenna created the term in the famous Hall case but that’s not actually factual (Hall v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:52 pm
"); Power Test Petroleum Distr., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
In McKenna v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 6:00 am
In McKenna v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
McKenna: not the 7th Cir. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:41 pm
In McKenna v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 9:34 am
Harry’s Chocolate Shop Incorporated v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Mark McKenna and I put together an amicus brief in this case, arguing that the false designation of origin verdict based on claims about who invented certain technology was precluded by Dastar (and nominative fair use, to the extent it was based on a slide deck showing that a game could be played with the relevant technology).http://tushnet.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default? [read post]