Search for: "McKennon v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by Robert McKennon
Cal. 2010), the court held that evidence of an award of Social Security disability benefits was necessary for an adequate de novo review of the plan administrator’s determination, where the Social Security decision was rendered six months after the denial of the claimant’s final administrative appeal in the ERISA matter. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 8:47 am by McKennon Law Group
However, the judge wrote that the “Social Security Administration’s decision . . . corroborates [Mrs.] [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by McKennon Law Group
For example, if a disability claimant received a favorable disability opinion from Social Security Administration, courts will typically allow disability claimants to augment the record to include them. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:23 am by McKennon Law Group
For example, if a disability claimant received a favorable disability opinion from Social Security Administration, courts will typically allow disability claimants to augment the record to include them. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm by Pringletech
  Notably, on August 30, 2020, the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) awarded the plaintiff monthly benefits because “under SSA’s rules, [the claimant] became disabled on March 12, 2018. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:01 pm by Robert J. McKennon
Did the insurer fail to account for a contrary decision by the Social Security Administrator that the claimant was disabled? [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 4:49 pm by Pringletech
  The court’s disability finding was further supported by the Social Security Administration’s determination that the claimant was “less than sedentary” and, therefore, disabled from “any gainful occupation. [read post]