Search for: "McKenzie v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 222
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 12:09 pm
Morgan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court granted Wednesday the state’s petition for a writ of supersedeas to stay enforcement of the court of appeals’ judgment in State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:00 am
The court of appeals’ opinion in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:16 am
McKenzie v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 am
Out of the Jungle: Copyright and Fair Use at Georgia State - Good summary by Betsy McKenzie with links to additional posts and articles regarding the whole copyright case involving GSU.Another good post: Decision Summary: Publishers v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
In McKenzie v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
In a year when at least one parent and one campaigner had been held in contempt of court for breach of that law (albeit a breach of a specific injunction rather than the rules per se – see Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2376, the last in a series of judgments in that case [update 5 July : in fact there is a later judgment Doncaster MBC v Watson [2011] EWHC 2498 which deals with the question of whether the court could make a suspended order on an application to… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:16 pm
In McKenzie Check Advance of Florida LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:31 am
The case is entitled McKenzie v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 10:03 pm
The attorney for the lender, McKenzie Check Advance, contended that Bland's argument was foreclosed by AT&T v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
Payne, 34 A.3d 370 (Conn. 2012); State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
Supreme Court will be hearing arguments in April, 2012 on this issue in another case, Christopher v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) (glass in piece of cake); McKenzie v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:04 am
In Moreau v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:07 am
GUEST-POST PART I | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
From that moment, the long arm of the Russian State Prosecutors’ Office was visible at every twist and turn in the English court proceedings. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) and McKenzie v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
The opinion then cited AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
