Search for: "McKeown v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2018, 9:15 am
She prides herself on being “one of the first original iPad judges,” -- “The whole digital revolution has changed both the technology we have and also the face of many states within the 9th Circuit,” McKeown said during an interview in her San Diego chambers.She received a Green Bag award for her opinion-writing in De Fontbrune v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:59 am
" Judge Tashima dissents, so it helps to have Judge McKeown essentially paint Mr. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:25 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 8:47 pm
Orin Kerr has this post at The Volokh Conspiracy: Next week, a panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Thomas, Reinhardt, and McKeown) will hear oral argument in the second round of United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:26 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McKeown v British Horseracing Authority [2010] EWHC 508 (QB) (12 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Rowe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 524 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Cooperative Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Northumberland County Council [2010] EWHC 373 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Raw, R (on the application of) v London Borough of… [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:57 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has live-streaming video of this morning’s oral argument, in a challenge to the NSA’s call records program. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:23 pm
Which is a relevant question, since that's what defendants are now doing (and what the United States files suit to enjoin).Judge McKeown frames the question as follows: "In this appeal, we are asked to determine the unusual question whether dogs are 'livestock.'" And while the district court said that they weren't, and hence granted summary judgment to the United States, Judge McKeown disagrees. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:44 am
Detrich v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:58 pm
Classic Judge McKeown. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:47 am
McKeown’ s third counterclaim fails to state a cause of action because Judiciary Law § 487 is not applicable when Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:42 am
Cooper v. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 6:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 1:20 pm
Judge McKeown focuses -- understandably -- on the one at issue here: when a state forces a company to use a state officer as its agent. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:12 pm
Not.)Judge McKeown's majority opinion holds that the right rule is that they're only "located" where their headquarters are. [read post]
