Search for: "McKinney v. State Bar" Results 41 - 60 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am by admin
The case, out of Judge Scott Becker’s state district court in McKinney, involved allegations that former employees were violating their confidentiality and non-solicitation agreements. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:12 am by Michael Grossman
The idea here is that our state’s lawmakers don’t want bars to be sued just because they sell alcohol; that wouldn’t make any sense. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
McKinney, 5th District holds that speedy trial on latter OVI charge did not begin to run until time of charge, not time of arrest… In State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
In a notable Tennessee opinion,  Timothy Terell McKinney v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
New York courts have previously recognized the distinction between professional malpractice and ordinary negligence in the medical malpractice context (e.g., Yaniv v Taub, 256 AD2d 273, 274 [1st Dept 1998] [“failure to communicate significant medical findings to a patient or his treating physician is not malpractice but ordinary negligence”]; McKinney v Bellevue Hosp., 183 AD2d 563, 565 [pt Dept 1992] [permitting claim of simple negligence… [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am by Edmund LaCour
Madison instead argued that the state court had misapplied precedent that bars states from executing inmates who cannot rationally comprehend why they are being punished. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, the cross motion is time-barred (see Podlaski v Long Is. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Connors, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C3025:3 at 87, citing Mendoza v Mendoza, 4 Misc 2d 1060, 1061 [Sup Ct, NY County 1947], affd 273 App Div 877 [1st Dept 1948]). [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
A FOIL request is not required as a condition precedent to obtaining public documents or records where access to such records is not barred by statute or exempted from disclosure by law. 3. [read post]