Search for: "McMahon v. McMahon" Results 201 - 220 of 422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 220 (1987) i. andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Code of Arbitration Procedureandnbsp;Proposed by Self-regulatory organizations approved by SEC ii. andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Competence of Panels (expertise vs. bias) iii. andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; Federal Policy (time, expense, efficiency)andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp;andnbsp; … [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
  B-NY: Sentimental value of prop. held by family for generations doesnt outweigh benefit to crs. from sale per 363(h). http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Beck-BK-EDNY-Eisenberg-9-6-11.doc … B-FL: No admin. priority for severance pay arising from prepet. empl. agr. just bec employee was employed postpetition. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/RobbStuckyLtd-BK-MD-FL-Delano-9-7-11.doc … B-AZ: Legal mal. cplt. alleging attys knew… [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Bankruptcy, Biglaw, Clawback agreements, Clawback provisions, Clawbacks, Colleen McMahon, Coudert Brothers, Dissolution, Jewel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Bankruptcy, Biglaw, Clawback agreements, Clawback provisions, Clawbacks, Colleen McMahon, Coudert Brothers, Dissolution, Jewel v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Here's more in the continuing "Year in Review" series, delivering more of my backlog of twitter posts of case developments in the past 12 months. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by Matthew David Brozik
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:10 pm by Ron Coleman
Bella No More Last week, on July 19th, the Southern District of New York put the pedal to the Lanham Act metal in in Coach v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
A v Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] 4 I.R. 88; [2006] IESC 45. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
Thus, the District Court for the Southern District of New York followed the decision of Jewel v. [read post]