Search for: "McNamara v. McNamara"
Results 181 - 200
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2009, 8:07 am
McNamara of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
Levine: How to Survive in a Post-Preemption World," with Kurt Karst and John Fleder, both of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Earlier in McNamara v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:04 pm
McNamara, had treated the Martinez decision as a binding precedent. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:37 am
McNamara 78 NY2d 626, 633 (1991). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 6:05 am
From SSRN:Lawrence McNamara, Catch the Fire Ministries v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:56 pm
Justice McNamara cited Martinez v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 6:23 am
Wright v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
Johns, MI 48879-2423 Phone: (989) 224-0333 (V/TTY); (800) 274-7426 (Toll Free) E-mail: matr@edzone.net Web: http://www.cenmi.org/matr Michigan Telework Loan Fund C/O U.C.P. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 6:45 am
July 1, 2004), aff'd, 422 F.3d 307, 313 (5th Cir. 2005); McNamara v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
The same issue was bypassed in McNamara v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:32 pm
Also denied was McNamara v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:32 pm
Also denied was McNamara v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Morgan -- proof of the minimum amount in dispute before a class action civil lawsuit may be transferred from state to federal court for trial. 06-1481, McNamara v. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 10:36 am
McNamara's ruling in Godfrey v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 3:12 am
Galarza, 484 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2007) McNamara v City of Rittman, 473 F.3d 633 (6th Cir. 2007) Rockstead v City of Crystal Lake, 486 F.3d 963 (7th Cir. 2007) Gideon Kanner has already deconstructed the reasoning in the last case in a post on his blog entitled "Franz Kafka Weds Alice in Wonderland. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 1:04 pm
For example, it has been found that the mere presence of the odor of marijuana is not sufficient evidence of knowledge, Metzger v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 10:05 am
" McNamara v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 7:42 am
March 30, 2007)*; McNamara v. [read post]
